Even if the first true RPG I got my hand on the red box D&D first, many of its concepts I did not understand. You have to jump back to 1984... Many of the concepts therein I did not understand. Literally. Did not understand. Back then while I spoke English, I was far from fully fluent. The basics, I got.
All that changed at my 12th birthday.
Like most early 1980s RPGs, it was a D&D clone. You could be a warrior, a wizard, an elf, a dwarf, or the more generic "adventurer". The game was quite simple, but had a number of interesting things within: the attack and defense numbers were assigned by the player each round, there were no alignments, to cast magic the elf or the wizard had to speak out the "magic" formula (I still remember the fulminictus or medousa spells), a mana system for magic.
The adventure book had two short adventures as "example". One was a solo and one was for a small group.
The adventures written for that game system are quite good, and are still in my library. I refer to them regularly, if only to look at the pictures.
I still love this game.
JP
I am glad that you appreciated this game, as I was a member of the translation team from German to French for edition Gallimard back in the mid 80's. I should perhaps say adaptation because we worked with a professional translator that was good in translation but who had no understanding of what a RPG is. Amongst the team I was the only one to have some basis in German (i had studied it for 5 years as my 2d foreign language), and I remember fairly well that we had to input a lot of interpretation in to order to make the translated rules playable. At the end we were happy to have produced a playable game, but we were also nearly sure that we had modified some parts of the original rules (for the best).
ReplyDeleteSide note: I had previously worked with the same team coordinator on the translation of Pendragon.
Side note: I had previously worked with the same team coordinator on the translation of Pendragon.
ReplyDeleteor was it after ?